-2.png&w=1080&q=75)
Evaluating the Skoda Kylaq AT and the Kia Syros DCT, here's a breakdown of their performance characteristics, emphasizing notable distinctions in horsepower, how they handle on the road, their transmissions, fuel economy, passenger comfort, and included features.
⚙️ Propulsion & Capability
Engine Performance & Torque
Skoda Kylaq AT: 1.0 L turbo-petrol unit generating 115 PS and 178 Nm, coupled with a 6-speed torque-converter automatic
Kia Syros DCT: 1.0 L turbo petrol produces a slightly higher 120 PS and 172 Nm, paired with a 7-speed DCT; in addition, a 1.5 L diesel option provides 116 PS and a robust 250 Nm
Acceleration & Road Handling
Kylaq sprints from 0–100 km/h in roughly 10.5 seconds, providing steady high-speed stability (stated top speed ~188 km/h).
Syros petrol's DCT provides precise and rapid gear changes, improving refinement and city driving characteristics—the diesel iteration delivers potent low-end torque.
🛞 Driving Experience
Skoda Kylaq AT
Recognized for its composed ride, responsive handling, and steadfastness even at speed. Numerous user accounts commend its enjoyable driving traits:
"Drove the Kylaq automatic during a test... the steering is wonderfully light, the feedback is great... it's incredibly stable."
Kia Syros DCT
Made for comfortable and feature-packed urban journeys. Its ride is gentler, providing comfort at slower speeds, but can feel uneven at higher speeds.
Provides seamless gear shifts via its 7-speed DCT, though spirited driving emphasizes a smooth experience.
⛽ Fuel Efficiency (ARAI)
| Variant | Claim (kmpl) |
|---|---|
| Kylaq AT (Auto) | 19.05 |
| Syros Petrol DCT (Auto) | 17.68 |
| Syros Diesel AT | 17.65 |
| Syros Diesel MT | 20.75 |
Kylaq AT is better on fuel compared to Syros petrol-DCT, whereas Syros diesel gets the best mileage overall.
Comfort and Everyday Use
Kylaq AT: Features a stiffer suspension setup, which results in more direct handling and a steadier ride, but offers less room in the back seats.
Syros DCT: Focuses on comfort with a softer suspension, a more roomy interior, rear seats that can be adjusted, and a bigger trunk (approximately 465 L versus 446 L in the Kylaq).
🎛️ Features & Tech
Syros DCT shines with Level‑2 ADAS, a dual‑screen 30″ infotainment arrangement, cooled front & rear seats, a panoramic sunroof, a 360‑degree camera, plus high-end Harman Kardon audio.
Kylaq AT similarly offers ventilated front seats, connected technology, wireless charging, and a 5‑star Bharat NCAP safety score.
🏁 Conclusion
Pick the Skoda Kylaq AT if driving experience, fuel efficiency, solid handling, and top safety are key for you. It's the selection for driving aficionados.
Select the Kia Syros DCT if you value city-friendly comfort, cutting-edge technology, driver-assistance systems, and flexible functionality, especially with the available diesel engine.
Align your choice with your needs: Drivers who want an engaging, sporty car will likely prefer the Kylaq, whereas those prioritizing ease, amenities, and suitability for families could be drawn to the Syros.
#SUVComparison #TurboSUVs #SUVBattle #CarPerformance #IndiaSUVs
#SUVComparison #TurboSUVs #SUVBattle #CarPerformance #IndiaSUVs
jitu
Hey How are you?